Legislature(1995 - 1996)
03/19/1996 02:09 PM House HES
Audio | Topic |
---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
HR 12 - UNIV. COLLECTIVE BARGAINING CONTRACT Number 0510 CO-CHAIR BUNDE announced that HR 12, supporting the collective bargaining agreement between the University of Alaska and the Alaska Community Colleges' Federation of Teachers, was next on the agenda. REPRESENTATIVE BILL WILLIAMS, sponsor of HR 12, read from a sponsor statement, " I introduced HR 12 on behalf of the Alaska Community College Federation of Teachers (ACCFT). It is my understanding that on May 8, 1992, the University of Alaska Board of Regents approved a collective bargaining agreement between the University of Alaska and the ACCFT. In June of 1993, through a change in university policy, the collective bargaining agreement was compromised. An April 1995 arbitration decision ruled the original collective bargaining agreement should be fulfilled. I am asking that the legislature support the ruling of the arbitrator." Number 0520 RALPH McGRATH, Alaska Community Colleges' Federation of Teachers, said ACCFT represents the full-time staff who teach in vocational, technical, adult basic education, continuing education, the extended sites of the University of Alaska and are the faculty who are responsible for the 100 and 200 introductory courses. He said ACCFT has been a faculty organization for over 20 years representing the interests of the community college component of the University of Alaska. He said, he believed, that many of the committee members had received support letters from faculty around the state expressing hope and interest that the legislature would support HR 12. Number 0622 MR. McGRATH said the issue involved, is different from many of the other collective bargaining agreements, because it is an existing contract. He said this contract was negotiated and approved by the Board of Regents in 1992. He said the regent's policy, adopted as part of the contract, was to compensate faculty for work performed. He said in 1994, the Board of Regents suspended that policy. He said ACCFT took the matter to arbitration and received the arbitrator's award last April which upheld the validity of the contract and that the terms agreed upon must be met. Number 0654 MR. McGRATH said the issue of appropriation to meet this contract came before the legislature. He said, during the last legislative session, no formal action was taken by the legislature to reject the contracts. He said ACCFT is familiar with the legal counsel for the legislature, and knows the significance when no action is taken on an issue. He said this is a problem that was created by the University of Alaska and that they should have met the terms of the contract. He said the Board of Regents determined the policy, knew the terms of the policy, knew that the contract terms deemed arbitration boards as final and binding. He said that when the arbitration board says the university shall pay that is what it means. Number 0659 MR. McGRATH said, because the university still refuses to pay, ACCFT is asking the legislature to support the legal opinion of last year and perhaps to provide a signal to the university, that when they fail to meet the terms of contract, they should be disciplined and they should not blame the legislature for rejecting their contracts. He said the university should meet the demands of the contract for the 285 people it represents. Number 0759 BILL JERMAIN, Attorney, ACCFT, said he was the Deputy Commissioner of Labor for the state of Alaska and drafted the first bills on PERA. He said there are several things that are obvious in PERA. He said the purpose of PERA is to encourage collective bargaining and to clearly have a separation of powers. He said the Executive Branch negotiates the contracts while the Legislative Branch appropriates money. He said from the history of the legislation there must be an affirmative rejection. If a agreement is negotiated and the legislature appropriates general funds for a purpose, those funds go to that purpose. He said this statement is compatible with the opinion given by Legislative Counsel, Kramer, and one which ACCFT agrees with. He said if you fail to this, you discourage the collective bargaining process. He said until you have legislation agreeing to this process, you have a law that states you must meet the terms of your agreement. He said you would have a situation where you would pay non-representatives out of general appropriation which would create immediate disparity and unfairness. Number 0869 MR. McGRATH said the problem is complicated by the fact that in collective bargaining agreements, you have a give and take. He said, in the state of Alaska, there are circumstances where you have established cost savings which could not have been accomplished any other way except by collective bargaining. He said the fair labor standards provisions were accomplished through the collective bargaining process, saving the state billions of dollars. He said the disadvantage is that the state does not fund the financial obligation that was the give and take in that arrangement. He said it is the Executive Branch position, that unless you specifically appropriate additional monies for that collective bargaining agreement, the state will not pay their obligations. He said if this occurs, then the legislature will always be the "bad guy." Number 0889 MR. McGRATH said the university will negotiate an agreement and then not honor its obligations, looking at the legislature for appropriations. He said, no matter how much money the legislature gives the university, they are not going to meet their obligation unless the legislature gives them additional money. He said this practice does not lead to one of fiscal responsibility. Number 0904 MR. McGRATH said there is litigation dealing with the failure of the university to honor its 1995 obligations. He said the university received appropriations from the legislature for 1995, but it has never been given to the community college group. He said a specific bill was passed stating that the sum of $507,000 was appropriated to the University of Alaska for a three year percent salary adjustment to satisfy those monetary terms of a collective bargaining agreement entered into with ACCFT for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1995. He said, even though the legislature expressly appropriated money, the money has not been paid. He said this legislature has spoken eloquently to fiscal responsibility and added that this situation is not fiscally responsible by the Executive Branch of government.
Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
---|